Comments on: In Chandler, nothing is ever overdue – Part 2 of 2 http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/ Thu, 12 May 2011 16:41:36 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Mimi Yin http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15270 Mimi Yin Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:21:24 +0000 http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/#comment-15270 Hi Joe V. I've logged a bug to track your request for user-definable triage statuses. Others have asked for it as well :) https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11943 It's not a trivial addition to the app, so I'm recommending that we re-evaluate this feature after we implement the improvements to the LATER section suggested in this blog post. Best, Mimi Hi Joe V.

I’ve logged a bug to track your request for user-definable triage statuses. Others have asked for it as well :) https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11943

It’s not a trivial addition to the app, so I’m recommending that we re-evaluate this feature after we implement the improvements to the LATER section suggested in this blog post.

Best,
Mimi

]]> By: Mimi Yin http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15269 Mimi Yin Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:14:10 +0000 http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/#comment-15269 Hi Benjamin, Yes we have bugs that roughly approximate the features you're asking for. It look like might end up with a different set of defaults for how Triage Status sorts, but we also want to give users a way to manually define their own sub-sorts. I think these would be the 2 bugs you're interested in. - Customizing what attributes are displayed in each column https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10931 - Implement primary and secondary sort https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5422 Best, Mimi Hi Benjamin,

Yes we have bugs that roughly approximate the features you’re asking for. It look like might end up with a different set of defaults for how Triage Status sorts, but we also want to give users a way to manually define their own sub-sorts. I think these would be the 2 bugs you’re interested in.

- Customizing what attributes are displayed in each column
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10931

- Implement primary and secondary sort
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5422

Best,
Mimi

]]> By: Joe V. http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15260 Joe V. Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:01:14 +0000 http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/#comment-15260 I agree a distinction needs to be drawn between "LATER - No date" and "LATER - Not really". Maybe the sub-sections could be customizable, with the above-discussed sub-sections being the defaults? I agree a distinction needs to be drawn between “LATER – No date” and “LATER – Not really”.

Maybe the sub-sections could be customizable, with the above-discussed sub-sections being the defaults?

]]> By: Dan http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15217 Dan Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:06:10 +0000 http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/#comment-15217 I think the idea of a "Later - not really" section is great. (Though I'd probably name it slightly differently; maybe "unlikely" or "never"). I think the idea of a “Later – not really” section is great. (Though I’d probably name it slightly differently; maybe “unlikely” or “never”).

]]> By: Benjamin Melançon http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15197 Benjamin Melançon Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:22:35 +0000 http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2008/03/17/in-chandler-nothing-is-ever-overdue-part-2-of-2/#comment-15197 And we will have a sort by actual date, not alarm date, perhaps by default? In addition to sort by section (NOW / LATER / DONE) and then by date within section. Good stuff. And we will have a sort by actual date, not alarm date, perhaps by default?

In addition to sort by section (NOW / LATER / DONE) and then by date within section.

Good stuff.

]]>