<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PyLucene without GCJ released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2007/09/24/pylucene-without-gcj-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2007/09/24/pylucene-without-gcj-released/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:41:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hargrave</title>
		<link>http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2007/09/24/pylucene-without-gcj-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hargrave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chandlerproject.org/2007/09/24/pylucene-without-gcj-released/#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious what the performance difference would be between calling the Lucene Java classes with Jpype (http://jpype.sourceforge.net/) vs the compiled JCC version. Other pros and cons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious what the performance difference would be between calling the Lucene Java classes with Jpype (<a href="http://jpype.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://jpype.sourceforge.net/</a>) vs the compiled JCC version. Other pros and cons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

